Far better Meizu than all those highly priced flagship.Guys, have a look at this. A review from AnandTech.
the link to read the review is: http://www.anandtech.com/show/10545/the-meizu-pro-6-review/5 | |
|
|
|
|
tks for sharing
| |
|
|
|
|
Nobody can deny the fact that Samsung Exynos CPU are much better than MTK and sometimes even Qualcomm Snapdragon in terms of both power and specially energy efficiency. Hope next Meizu flagship comes with Exynos CPU again.
| |
RateExperience 0Prestige 0Gold +5 |
|
|
good to know
| |
|
|
|
|
So where are all the users who refused to believe us when we told them the Pro 6 was worse than the Pro 5 in most aspects?
 | |
|
|
|
|
Well, still it is visible, that Meizu Pro 5 doesn't have successor and still is TOP flagship
 | |
|
|
|
Tymcio replied at 2016-09-17 22:47 M using pro 5 too coz of lppddr4 ram n exynos 7420! | |
|
|
|
|
Edited by jmm4515 at 2016-09-19 03:23
If meizu just optimized the flyme more and has fewer bugs it would have been a dream phone, exynos was ruined, plus flyme ruined the device even a year it was released, it should have been better than it was released, well its meizu, typical meizu, Lol | |
|
|
|
Ramtin replied at 2016-09-17 04:12 | |
|
|
|
jmm4515 replied at 2016-09-18 01:47 Actually, Meizu has a reason to choose MTK over other two. MTK CPU support full China Network Communications but, other two just support some network bands in China. But, it's worst choice for international customers of Meizu. In my opinion Chinese users also prefer more efficient and powerful CPU than a CPU that is not in flagship grade but, support all Chinese network bands. Losing 1 or 2 bands in 4G mode in some Chinese telecoms is not a big deal and it's not worth over loosing power and efficiency all the time because, of using weaker CPU. | |
|
|
|
15