Is snapdragon better as comaped to meidaTekAs we all know these days new innovation is coming every day and mobile phone processors are also becoming more smaller and powerful. There are many tough competitors in the market, but the two processor manufacturing according to us are: 1)Qualcomm 2)Mediatek
Many medium range smartphones are offering good specs which include both Qualcomm as well as Mediatek processors for ex- If we go some months back, middle range smartphones like Xiaomi Redmi 1s offers a Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor(32 bit) clocked at 1.6ghz which is also a very successful processor but its competitor Android One smartphones offers Mediatek MT6582(32 bit) processor clocked at 1.3ghz. personally we like the Mediatek processor with slightly good performance then Snapdragon’s 400 processor. So we are comparing today the two most popular processor manufacturers, on the view that which is gonna be the best performer. Mostly all the flagship devices are powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon processors.But the performance of Qualcomm in-2015 is not as expected because phones like Yureka, Mi4i, Xolo black, MICROMAX Canvas knight 2 all comes with same processors which is Snapdragon’s 615 Octacore chipset which is decent in day to day performance but has heating issues and has average benchmarks scores. But Mediatek’s story is different their MT6752, Mt6753,Helio X10. are very good processors in terms of gaming as well as day to day performance. Phones like Lenovo K3 note, Meizu M1 note, Lenovo A7000, Auxus beast all are powered by MT6752(64 bit) processor clocked at 1.7ghz which has almost 9000 score more then Snapdragon’s 615 as per Antutu 64 bit scores. Qualcomm has some problem because their so called flagship chipset which is Snapdragon 810 also has issues relating to heat and ability to perform, that’s why LG’s flagship device uses Snapdragon’s 808 rather then 810. The Mediatek’s Helio X10 is powering Htc one ME and is very good processor clocked at 2.2ghz. Mediatek made cheap processors when compared to Qualcomm but both are good in performance. The final verdict is that the year 2015 is of Mediatek. | |
|
|
Note: The author has been banned or deleted.
| |
|
|
Edited by ark45 at 2016-01-21 20:27
1st of all this way you not able to compare two processor because many factor processor design,chip size,arm version etc.and also benchmark score just used to reviewers and companies to show that your new model became flagship.example a teacher give you 8 homework ,then next task swimming ,then take some food then Cycling after complete task you get a score.same way after 3-4 task test by benchmark give a result .But some time when need your able done a work less score mobile also in minimum time.Last part os optimization if your not able to optimize properly with hardware and software never get success by useing snapdragon or mtk... | |
|
|
ultrametric replied at 2016-01-21 20:03 right plus snapdragon has already get licensed feature like quick charge...any other company need pay for use this... | |
|
|
Note: The author has been banned or deleted.
| |
|
|
hello first check what you said you are comparing mediatek with snapdragon and there is no comparision b/w helio x10 and snapdragon 810, snapdragon 810 is really a powerful chip and heat depends upon build quality also as you know about le max it uses snap 810 soc no underclocking with 4gb ddr4 ram i didnt found any issue in it for further information you can search how you compare helio x10 with snap 810 pls check benchmark and yes you are facing
a issue after a heavy usage snapdragon 810 slows down its not the architecture problem qualcomm solve this issue its not their chip issue in le max new eui update fix this issue your device heat little bit but its normal in this update all core run interactive, your are facing this issue no one check after a usage 3 of your cores stopped so you face lag in performance if you want to see snap 810 real power buy le max | |
|
|
SD even if it heats has a better life than MT processors!!
| |
|
|
6